Let's Fix This Country

American Betrayal Again? Thousands Left Behind in Afghanistan?

As in Vietnam, as in Iraq, as in Syria, the United States has left behind the thousands who helped our military in Afghanistan. In his headlong rush to pull out the troops, pressing for mid-July rather  August 31: Just as forecast, as a result of Joe Biden’s haphazard, unplanned evacuation, America has betrayed thousands of Afghans who helped our country and who now face a Taliban now seeking them out for torture and murder.
    

than his original September 11 deadline, President Biden seems only at this last minute to have discovered that we are entirely unprepared to rescue the interpreters, drivers, cultural advisers, security guards, many of whom have been embedded with our troops, living with them at remote firebases, risking their lives on combat patrols, and now face inhuman retribution by the Taliban for their having rendered essential service to the U.S.

He pledges that thousands of Afghan interpreters for the US military will be evacuated as American forces leave. He has no idea how and perhaps should worry that he faces his own Saigon moment. Republicans will absolve themselves and be merciless.

can do?

There is a backlog of 18,000 who have applied for the Special Immigrant Visa meant for them, a total of perhaps 70,000 people counting their family members, who are stuck in the bureaucratic hairball of an absurdly copious vetting process that seems not to recognize that these workers had already been screened before their employment and went on to prove their loyalty performing valuable service alongside the military, the diplomatic corps, and contractors. Vetting takes an average of three and a half years to process a single applicant, and some wait much longer. This was once a country that turned on a dime to supply allies with armament in World War II and, at peak, produced 17 B-17s a day.

But the cavalry has arrived! “Lawmakers Rush to Help Afghans Seeking Visas for Helping the U.S.”, said a New York Times headline. A mix of 16 Republicans and Democrats in Congress has woken at this late hour to signal their virtue with a call for simplification of the clearance process, about which they can do nothing. That role lies with an executive branch that has no plan. Faced with the same lack of foresight, we evacuated 111,000 Vietnamese to Guam when we scrambled out of that war, and that again seems to be the only option. But first, the Taliban have been on the move taking districts all over the country, so how in a few short weeks can 70,000 from all over Afghanistan make their way to Kabul for evacuation? Once we’ve left, how do we airlift 70,000 to Guam? How do we immediately quarter them? Wll the Seabees again build tent cities? How do we then muster food, healthcare, and so on?

Secretary of State Antony Blinken seems blinkered about the problem. He called evacuation “the wrong word,” and argued instead for improving the functioning of the visa program. No rush, Mr. Secretary.

President Trump negotiated a deal with the Taliban in February of 2020 that our troops would pull out by the May 1st just passed. (In an October tweet he then said he wanted them out by last Christmas, ignorant of logistics). Trump worsened the visa backlog, says Representative Jason Crow (D-Co), a former Army Ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, by starving the program of resources and staff. He and his administration passed on the mess to Biden having developed no plan for bringing out Afghans who assisted us. Nevertheless, it’s now Biden’s problem, who until now has been equally oblivious. He should be alarmed that this is shaping up as his Saigon moment.

We have been here before

Four-star Gen. Barry McCaffrey recently said, “I’m still sick to my stomach the way we handled Vietnam”. A company commander then with the 1st Cavalry he says, “We left them in the lurch”.

When Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese, those who worked for the Americans faced death. The Communist regime sent many of those who had fought against it to brutal “reeducation camps” where thousands are thought to have died.. The 111,000, first in
Tent city on Guam after Vietnam evacuation/ AP

tent cities, were then brought to military bases in the U.S. to await processing. Those not evacuated took to the sea as so-called “boat people” over the next 20 years to escape Communist rule.

In Vietnam it was a matter of the military itself in addition to interpreters and helpers. “I lived and worked with members of the South Vietnamese military. I counted them as friends”, said Jim Jones, a Vietnam combat veteran who became a Idaho attorney general and Idaho supreme court justice. “I gladly trusted them with my life.” The U.S. government had a moral obligation to extract as many of its allies as possible, but instead we abandoned thousands, he says.

Iraqi lives didn’t matter

The refugee problem caused by ISIS overrunning northern Iraq prompted Congress to create in 2008 the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV), which is the means by which most who helped Americans apply for entry to the U.S.

Yearslong delays in processing the visas ensued, while, said one report, thousands who assisted the U.S. mission were kidnapped, tortured, their lives threatened, forcing them to go into hiding. Many were killed by the insurgents.

Allen Vaught, serving as a captain in 2003-2004, helped two families settle in Texas, and has spent years lobbying for a third, who fled to Egypt to escape retaliation. But two other translators who aided his unit were executed, “And the way they killed them was gruesome. One of my translators was burned alive”.

A group of nine Iraqis sued the departments of State and Homeland Security after waiting more than four years after submitting their applications. About one of the plaintiffs Green Beret Col. Richard Welch said, “You cannot overstate the impact he had in stabilizing the Ghazaliya district that spared countless U.S. and Iraqi lives”. Another “terp”, military argot for interpreter, became a target of car bombs; the military intercepted a phone caller who threatened to kidnap his son. A third was abducted and tortured by militiamen. Waiting for the “nearly impossible “vetting, one spoke for all of them: “My life has stopped for years”.

Brad Wenstrup, an Ohio Republican representative is a colonel in the Army Reserve. As a combat surgeon he relied on Iraqi translators when he served in Iraq as a combat surgeon. Two were killed in surprise attacks near Abu Ghraib. A third who ultimately got a visa is now a U.S. citizen and a cardiologist in Ohio. “They become your brothers and sisters”.

the sudden exit from syria

The U.S. supplied air support, but it was the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) who fought the five-year ground war against al-Assad and who suffered an estimated 11,000 of their number killed.

Yet Donald Trump suddenly decided to pull out of Syria and leave the Kurds at the mercy of the Turks and the Russians. The Turks consider the SDF an extension of the PKK, a Kurdish militant group at the eastern end of Turkey who fight for independence from his country and are viewed by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as terrorists. The presence of U.S. troops acted as a buffer preventing the Turks from massacring the Kurds, but Trump in a single phone call gave Erdogan the green light to invade Syria in a stunning act of betrayal. The Kurds had imagined they were in a partnership with the U.S., a view that seems foolish given Trump’s legendary loyalty to no one. We turned our backs as Kurd towns were shattered by “terrifyingly indiscriminate Turkish artillery barrages and air strikes”. It told the world that the U.S. can longer be relied on.

afghan fears mount

In December, Maj. Naiem Asadi, an Afghan helicopter pilot reputed to have killed more insurgents than anyone else in the Afghan air force, was denied entry to the U.S. and even made to
Afghan pilot Maj. Naiem Asadi and family safe in the U.S.
leave the safety of a U.S. military base in Afghanistan, forcing him and his family to go into hiding. “Find him and kill him” read a Taliban online post with his photograph. After six years in the fight, 3,000 flight hours, and hundreds of missions — one providing air cover for an American pilot waiting for rescue after his plane crashed — our Department of Defense decided to consider him a deserter from the Afghan military for finally wanting to leave the service and go to the U.S.

The injustice drew enough outrage that Maj. Asadi and family are now safely in the United States, but it exhibited the DoD stateside blindness of what goes on worlds away in the battlespace.

Matt Zeller, from a military family in upstate New York, says interpreters are “your eyes and ears, your best early warning signal”. He was a lieutenant leading 14 soldiers in Afghanistan’s Ghazni province when his unit was ambushed by the Taliban, outnumbered three to one. He said, “My terp was more important to me than my weapon”. He was not exaggerating. Regaining consciousness after a mortar hit, two Taliban were advancing to kill him when he felt someone drop in next to him and open fire. His terp killed the Talibani.

Stateside, Zeller successfully worked to bring in Janis Shinwari, his interpreter, and crowdsourced $35,000 to give his family a start here, but Mr. Shinwari proudly refused the money, wanting to make it on his own. Zeller used the money to start No One Left Behind, a non-profit that works to cut through the red tape and bring into the U.S. those who helped us. His organization has tracked the killings of more than 300 translators or their family members since 2014, many of whom died while waiting for their visas to be processed.
Afghan interpreters asking not to be forgotten

The interpreter who fought alongside former Marine Ben Wormington was still waiting for a visa in 2019 after applying in 2008.

“He’s like a Marine to me. A Marine that we’ve left behind. If they stamped his passport, I would pay for his flight and his family would live in my house in Omaha.”

The danger in Afghanistan is such that he cannot tell even his children about his past. A slip of the tongue could cost his family their lives.

plugging the pipeline

Congress authorizes the visas and has dragged its feet, parsimoniously doling out a few at a time, often with nativist overtones in their debates. In 2016, at a time when 10,000 more were needed, it voted piecemeal — only 1,500 additional visas, despite the best efforts of Senators John McCain and Jeanne Shaheen. “People are going to die”, said McCain on the Senate floor, in rebuke of a fellow Republican who was blocking visas. “Don’t you understand the gravity of that?”

In 2016, Republican Senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Jeff Sessions of Alabama questioned the necessity of the program and argued for shutting it down, seeking to be in the good graces of Donald Trump, the party’s presidential nominee who was inveighing against refugees and immigrants. Senate rules permit a single senator to put a hold on legislative items and Mike Lee of Utah actually used that rule to block the amendment for additional visas altogether from the 2016 defense authorization bill. Shaheen, a Democrat from New Hampshire, continues today to press the administration to honor our commitments.

Two months into his presidency, just after he banned residents of six Muslim countries from entering the country, Donald Trump also shut down the special visa program, even though Afghanistan was not one of the six. His original ban had included Iraq, leaving those who had supported American forces exposed to reprisals. Afghans were told to no longer apply for special visas.

Trump in 2017 cut the overall refugee quota in half to 50,000. Overall, by 2019 some 110,000 Iraqis were waiting to be approved by the refugee program, a number that included the special visa program for those who assisted us. Mr. Trump would subsequently cut the cap four straight years, ultimately to 15,000, the lowest in the program’s four decade-long history.

In fiscal 2019 only 153 Iraqi refugees whose applications were given high priority were admitted, down from a high of 9,829 in 2014, according to government data. One was Suhad Munshid, who resettled in Missoula, Montana. Her family home had been used as a safe house for American troops. She had waited nearly seven years after she applied. For 2020, Trump capped the subset of those who assisted U.S. troops and personnel at 4,000. His administration ultimately admitted only 161 Iraqis. Talking in his ear was his immigration czar, Stephen Miller, who was quoted as saying, “I would be happy if not a single refugee foot ever again touched American soil”.

sclerosis

The biggest hurdle, says Mr. Zeller, is bureaucracy. “To the government, these guys are refugees,” he says. “To me and the others who fought there, these guys are fellow vets.” Nevertheless, they are saddled with the cumbersome, multi-part process of endless paperwork that seems to have become America’s specialty. They have already proven both themselves and their loyalty, have done far more for our country than most Americans, yet have to be cleared by multiple security agencies from the FBI and CIA to the NSA.

For refugees the process can include requiring them to track down people they served with years ago to write a recommendation. Applications require a “credible sworn statement” recounting a specific threat as if assisting the U.S. does not automatically mean they are threatened with retribution.

“All the bureaucratic incentives” work against clearing visa applications from conflict areas, is how Steve Miska, who did three tours in Iraq and teaches national security at the Marine Corps University, put it. “No government agency wants to be put on the blame line for allowing a terrorist into the country”.

who are we?

How in any future conflict will any nation view America as trustworthy if we betray once again the promises we made to those willing to assist us? “I think many nations around the Middle East now are considering major changes in their strategic defense plans because they no longer see the United States as a reliable ally”, was one reaction, this from an organization in Cairo.

Travis Weiner’s interpreter was killed in Iraq waiting for a visa for which he had applied years earlier. The two-tour Army infantry veteran spoke for many who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and know their value.

“If people’s emotions about immigration are such that they are willing to tolerate literally leaving our wartime allies behind on the battlefield because they’re foreigners and they look different, then we really need to do a gut check about whether we really are the people we say we are.”

Trump Explores Options While Awaiting Reinstatement as President

Citizen Trump is mulling the many ways to return to the political arena. He admitted to Newsmax that he misses being president, but there are other possibilities.

The Senate seems to have once been considered; he reacted to an idea proposed on talk radio saying the idea “might be better than running

for the Senate”, although with the assumption of a Senate takeover by Republicans in 2022 that would give him the opportunity to unseat Mitch McConnell as majority leader in revenge for McConnell’s blistering criticism of the then-president’s actions on January 6th.

The idea had been posited by far-right radio host Wayne Allyn Root. He suggested that Trump should run for the House:

“Why not, instead of waiting for 2024, and I’m hoping you’ll run in 2024, but why not run in 2022 for the United States Congress? A House seat in Florida. Win big. Lead us to a dramatic landslide victory. Take the House by 50 seats”.

Trump immediately warmed to the idea. “That’s so interesting,” he said. “You know, it’s very interesting.”

Democrats have only a thin 219 to 211 lead in the House, lost ground in 2020, and the opposition party typically retakes the House in midterm elections — viz. 2010 and 2018.

Mr. Trump would not just be a representative, of course. He would surely be elected Speaker. Root then enticed the former president by suggesting he “lead the impeachment of Biden and start criminal investigations against Biden. You’ll wipe him out for his last two years.”

Actually, the idea dates from earlier. It was first heard from former White House strategist Steve Bannon, who laid it out before a group of Boston Republicans in February. Trump would displace Nancy Pelosi as speaker and launch impeachment proceedings against President Biden, he proposed.

None of this is likely. To begin with, he’d have to change county of residence; Palm Beach County is heavily Democratic. And it is hard to imagine Trump’s ego succumbing to being only 1 in 435 representatives, even if the speakership is assured.

resurrection

But he needn’t wait until 2022 or 2024, because he now believes that he will be reinstated as president by August. In a just released Politico poll, 29% of Republicans believe that this is “somewhat or very likely” to happen, as do — sit down for this — 13% of Democrats.

Where did this come from? The MyPillow guy, Mike Lindell, claims he was the one who assured Trump of this. By what means? Well, after the election Lindell had suggested Trump should declare martial law to stay in power. So had former Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, who visited the Oval Office in December to propose use of the military.

Flynn, who twice pleaded guilty of lying to the FBI during its Russia probe, but was pardoned by Trump, was at a Memorial Day weekend event in Texas popular with QAnon adherents called the “For God & Country Patriot Roundup”. As keynote speaker he proclaimed that Trump is still president.

“This is not a conspiracy theory. OK? This is not a conspiracy theory. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I base my life on facts and judgment”.

His facts tell him that “Trump won! He won! He won the popular vote, and he won the Electoral College vote.”

Someone in the audience asked why “what happened in [Myanmar] can’t happen here”, referring to the Asian nation’s ongoing military coup that has led to the killing of hundreds of protesters. The question brought cheers from the audience. Flynn responded, “no reason” why not. “I mean, it should happen here”, repeating, “No reason.” The speech was recorded and videoed. Flynn claimed he was misquoted.

The Washington Post reported at the beginning of June that Mr. Trump “brings the conversation back to the 2020 election” whenever his circle tries to change to a different subject. He avidly follows the Arizona recount and the attempts by Republican legislators and groups in other states to conduct ballot reviews of their own. Those around him say he” voraciously watches any television coverage he can find” of the Arizona recount and reads “everything he can get his hands on” about the audits in the belief that the election was stolen and audits will find he actually won. “He suggested recently to allies that their success could result in his return to the White House this year, according to people familiar with comments he has made”, the Post went on to say, but that “some advisers said that such comments appear to be just offhand musings”.

Trump-watcher Maggie Haberman at The New York Times reported the same, that he “has been telling a number of people he’s in contact with that he expects he will get reinstated by August”. She separately wrote, “It isn’t happening in a vacuum. It is happening as he faced the possibility of an indictment from the Manhattan DA.” Both were in tweets, not in the paper’s news pages.

That just brings howls of “fake news” from the right. But then we hear from the right itself — Charles Cooke at the very conservative The National Review, who headlines his piece “Maggie Haberman is Right”. He too “can attest, from speaking to an array of different sources, that Donald Trump does indeed believe quite genuinely that he…will be ‘reinstated’ to office this summer” based on the state audits. That Trump goes so far as to say he expects former senators David Perdue and Martha McSally to be reinstated as well lessens the notion that these are just offhand musings.

We have long been of the opinion that Trump’s narcissism causes him to create his own reality when the truth is uncomfortable, and that in his endless repetitions he comes to believe his own falsehoods. This would be, of course, an acute illness. Everything about his conduct says he now truly believes the election was stolen and that this will be proved. Moreover, so must every Republican believe along with him or he will be their enemy in the primaries, which obedience will serve to send to Congress in 2022 yet again an army of neuters too afraid to have spoken out.

Up in Smoke: Biden’s Agenda Stymied by Contrary Senators

As the weeks passed this spring, two ostensibly Democratic senators discovered the thrill of power. They realized they have Joe Biden’s presidency in their hands. They are not about to let go.

After signaling for weeks his opposition to scuttling the filibuster, West Virginia’s Joe Manchin has now announced by way of an op-ed in the
Senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin
the state’s Charleston Gazette-Mail that neither will he vote for the For the People Act, the measure that would set down basic standards against the corruption of federal elections, finding it too partisan and containing extraneous add-ons that “don’t pertain to voting”. He wrote, “I believe that partisan voting legislation will destroy the already weakening binds of our democracy”, he wrote, “and for that reason, I will vote against the For the People Act.”

There are reportedly other Democrats of the same view, but who realize that this is a make or break bill to counter the highly partisan election laws working their way through Republican-controlled state legislatures across the country, laws engineered to make voting difficult for certain Democratic groups, and worse, a new outbreak of provisions that allows legislatures to hand elections to Republicans even when the party loses. The president has lashed out against what states are doing as “un-American” and “an assault on democracy”. And Manchin, after 147 Republicans attempted to end democracy on January 6th by voting against certifying the states’ election results, now chooses to allow the Republicans to block the Democratic agenda. His parochial view seems blind to the consequences beyond the Senate, that his self-absorption will put the nation’s democracy again at serious risk.

Biden has no margin in the Senate. For a Democrat-proposed bill to pass in a thoroughly partisan Senate, Vice President Kamala Harris must step in to break 50-50 ties. Yet the president floats enormous spending proposals as if the word hasn’t gotten through that they don’t stand a chance. Allowing the filibuster to stand will block all that Biden hopes to accomplish because he cannot expect a single Republican vote in the Senate.

defectors

Allying with Manchin in strong opposition to the filibuster is is on again off again Democrat Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. Included in Biden’s national recovery plan are a couple of measures that could be passed by so-called reconciliation, a rule that provides that bills affecting money and the budget cannot be filibustered lest the operation of the government be disrupted, and need only 51 votes to pass. But Ms Sinema is said to be skeptical of even simple majority passage, concerned that legislation passed by one party can be overturned when the legislature changes hands.

The obvious seems unapparent to Sinema, that in today’s rigid polarization, indulging her principles to vote against close bills means nothing passes. No action leaves in place what her party had hoped to fix.

For Manchin, ending the filibuster would “be to destroy our government”. In April, he declared emphatically to The Washington Post, “There is no circumstance in which I will vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster”. In his op-ed he wrote, “Voting and election reform that is done in a partisan manner will all but ensure partisan divisions continue to deepen”.

Sinema, in office for a year and a half, says:

“The filibuster…was created as a tool to bring together members of different parties to find compromise and coalition…where you protect the rights of the minority from the majority regardless of which party is in the majority at the time”.

As for “created as a tool”, the filibuster was not devised “to bring together members of different parties”. It came into being by accident, when it was realized there were no means in the Constitution to end debate on a bill, and the Constitution is distinctly majoritarian — a simple majority was all that was intended in either House or Senate to pass a bill. That there are a couple of provisions in the Constitution calling for super majorities — for overriding a veto, for impeachment conviction, e.g. — make clear that the absence of any such proviso for the passage of legislation was deliberate.

A Data for Progress poll in February reported that 61% of of likely Arizona voters say passing major bills is a high priority, while just 26% say it’s more important to preserve Senate traditions. But representing her constituents may not be Sinema’s mission. Bloomberg quotes Chuck Coughlin, a GOP strategist in Phoenix, who thinks she is working on the “maverick” image of an Arizona senator who preceded her, John McCain. She even skipped out on the vote for the commission to investigate the January 6th insurrection.

At a separate moment, Ms Sinema went on,

“To those who say that we must make a choice between the filibuster and ‘X,’ I say, this is a false choice. The reality is that when you have a system that is not working effectively…the way to fix that is to fix your behavior, not to eliminate the rules or change the rules, but to change the behavior.”

Time is running short for her to change Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s behavior. Just as his declared mission in 2009 was to make Obama a one-term president, McConnell said,

“One hundred percent of my focus is standing up to this administration. What we have in the United States Senate is total unity from Susan Collins to Ted Cruz in opposition to what the new Biden administration is trying to do to this country.”

By supporting continuance of the filibuster, the two senators honor a practice that came into prominent use by southern Democrats to block civil rights legislation. It took Republican votes to overcome the filibuster waged by the racist bloc in the Democrats own party in order to pass the 1965 Civil Rights Act.

In this century it has become used to such a degree that merely the threat of a filibuster — which in earlier days meant standing in the well of the Senate and talking for hours from dusk to dawn until enough votes could be mustered to end debate — serves to halt a bill in its tracks without any debate at all.

The blunt fact is that, contrary to Sinema’s “work[ing] together to find a compromise”, the filibuster hands control of the Senate to the party that lost the election. It equips the opposition party to thwart everything put forth by the party the voters chose to lead.

But Manchin and Sinema will vote against their party’s goals when it comes time to strike down a practice that is not in the Constitution, not followed by any state, exists nowhere else on Earth, in which the other 195 or so countries have sensibly shown no interest.

In the process the duo will doom everything the party to which they nominally belong hopes to achieve under Joe Biden. With the filibuster left in his pocket, McConnell will run the Senate. Nothing will move forward.

The fallout goes further. Manchin and Sinema will give a big boost to Republicans winning the House and Senate in the 2022 elections because with McConnell wielding the filibuster, Democrats won’t have anything to show for their two years. The two play right into the hands of McConnell, whose creed is to block all legislation and then, come an election, tell voters that the opposition has accomplished nothing and should be removed from office.

On a trip to Tulsa for the commemoration of the city’s 1921 massacre, the president is waking up to his dire predicament. Asked about legislative progress, he said,

“I hear all the folks on TV saying, ‘Why doesn’t Biden get this done?’ Well, because Biden only has a majority of, effectively, four votes in the House and a tie in the Senate, with two members of the Senate who vote more with my Republican friends.”

That is not accurate, but Biden’s anger is justified.

Manchin has said he will vote for the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, a bill parallel to the For the People Act that would restore the rule that states need “preclearance” from the civil rights division of the Justice Department to change certain voting laws, a part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court’s conservative myopia struck down in 2013, one of the court’s worst blunders for its unleashing so many of the states’ restrictive laws. When John Dickerson of CBS asked Manchin why Republicans would vote for this law, given that it could restrict them in their state elections, Manchin replied, “If we can’t come to an agreement on that, God help us, John”. God? How about you, Joe? What will your principle be when 10 Republicans do not show up to make the 60 needed to overcome a filibuster against that law? Which will you stand for, voting rights or the filibuster, there being no two ways.