What Does Kim Jong-un Want?

Kim Jong-un stunned the world with a message to President Trump that said he is “committed to denuclearization”, will “refrain from any further nuclear or missile tests”, understands that the joint military exercises conducted by South Korea and the United States “must continue”, and is eager to meet President Trump “as soon as possible”.

The words are of South Korea’s national security adviser, Chung Eui-yong, who flew to Washington immediately after meeting with Kim Jong-un to present
them to President Trump, and are presumably a carefully accurate representation of what Mr. Kim offered.

The turnabout came after a year of the two leaders hurling threats and insults at each other, backed up by North Korea’s nuclear tests that appear to have graduated from fission to fusion and missiles that can now reach across the U.S., and by Trump’s ever-tightening of sanctions, blacklisting of collaborator companies, and warnings that “we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea” with “fire and fury the likes of which this world has never seen before”. It was “Rocket Man man is on a suicide mission for himself and for his regime” versus “I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire” as the two of them walked the brink for months.

Trump’s threats, and his frightening ignorance of how unimaginably catastrophic a nuclear war would be (“If we have them, why can’t we use them?”), may have worked to make a believer of Kim. While equally impetuous and combustible, he may at least have realized that Trump just might press the bigger button on his desk and that he, Kim, would lose his life and country in a nuclear exchange.

One phrase in the message is striking, although we’ve seen it go unnoticed in the media — that Kim is eager to meet President Trump “as soon as possible”. Diplomacy usually takes its time, and certainly so will these talks if they go forward, but what does the startling capitulation dangled in the offer and the rush to get started reveal? Does this possibly say that the sanctions are not just hurting, but that their severity may have brought about rumblings that have the 33-year old Kim worried about what matters most to him: holding power and his regime.

Instead, quite a bit of the analysis on the political talk shows dwelled on North Korea’s desire for legitimacy on the world stage as a motive for the North Korean leader to extend an olive branch. That it will be a coup for his small, rogue country and his young self to have summoned no less than the president of the United States to a meeting and he would soon be seen standing side-by-side with “the most powerful man in the world”. We’ll pass of that one. Kim Jong-un seems far more canny.

And that’s what worries those who think Mr. Trump has agreed to meet too easily. He rushed to bring us the news, poking into the White House briefing room late in the day to alert reporters that something big was about to happen, and then had South Korean envoy Chung read his message to reporters in the dark of the White House driveway rather than wait until the next day. Commentators could be forgiven for wondering if the haste was to change the subject from the furor over tariffs and the Stormy Daniels imbroglio — the “look over here” redirection that the president has employed repeatedly.

Trump had talked to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, traveling in Africa, but apparently did not tell him that he would immediately accept the North Korean invitation. This was the same day he went ahead with tariffs that will hurt allies such as Japan, doubly offended by Trump’s calling Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to broach the news with no prior consultation. Ditto China’s Xi Jinping, although Trump could tweet afterward, “President XI told me he appreciates that the U.S. is working to solve the problem diplomatically rather than going with the ominous alternative”.

Given the history with North Korea — of Kim’s father and grandfather using prolonged talks to develop their nuclear program in secret, of cheating, of broken deals — it would be unwise to expect too much from the meeting between the two.

If the meeting proceeds, Kim Jong-un’s demands will come tumbling out, probably far in excess of what the U.S. should agree to — the end of the joint military exercises, the removal of U.S. troops from the south, etc. — and Trump could find himself embarrassed for having been drawn in. Beijing or Seoul have been proposed for the meeting, but since appearances matter, the president might at least be better advised to make Kim come to him by siting the meeting in the West.

The other concern is that Mr. Trump may give away too much. He surely wants to be rid of the North Korean problem and may well be tempted to do so. Paramount for Mr. Kim will be the removal of sanctions. Trouble is, they can be lifted comparatively overnight, but the quid pro quo of denuclearization and verification is a long process which could easily degenerate into disputes, violations, and the deal’s collapse. That would happened on after the sanctions are long gone. It would be the perfect scenario for Kim, following the family tradition.

Fox News Fakes the News on North Korea

Donald Trump has scored a coup in bringing about a peace offering from North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, but wouldn’t you know, the liberal media have heaped nothing but scorn on this breakthrough. That’s the Fox News take.

Given the past history of deceit by North Korea, all media coverage of course had to be a mixture of promise and circumspection. But prime time stars Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity both showed short clips from rival shows carefully selected to suggest “the media’s absolutely reprehensible coverage — 91% negative — of President Trump’s big foreign policy victory with North Korea”. It was nothing of he sort, from one who combs through that media. As example, both showed Jeremy Bash, former Defense Department chief of staff, and at CIA before that, simply saying, it’s “a roll of the nuclear dice”. Which it is. We don’t know where it will lead. But for Hannity, it’s peace in our time: “We may have peace on the Korean peninsula”. He tells us the announcement of the North Korea offer…

“sent the media into a hate-filled frenzy. The partisan press is going absolutely apoplectic over President Trump’s peace through strength approach with dealing with little rocket man… To discuss denuclearization is now apparently aggravating and incensing liberal lapdog media people as they’re physically and mentally incapable of reporting any positive news about this president”.

Well, funny thing. The headline of the lede article in that hopelessly liberal New York Times read “Offer From North Korea To Enter Nuclear Talks With U.S. Raises Hopes”. That was followed by an editorial titled “Some Hope From North Korea”. A scan of Washington Post headlines shows none of what Hannity accuses. Instead articles with headlines such as “North Korea won’t give up its nuclear weapons. The U.S. has three good reasons to talk anyway”. Anything short of euphoric praise is Hannity’s “reprehensible”.

Here’s irony. The negativity — a hint anyway — that the two insist pervade the media could be found at thre conservative Walt Street Journal. Its lede article’s headline was “U.S. Wary Of Offer For Talks With Kim” and its editorial, titled “North Korea’s Negotiation Play” had the subhead, “Maybe this means pressure is working, or maybe it’s another con”.

One has to wonder what sort of mania is it that drives Hannity to such abject dishonesty. They both, Carlson as well, can deliver fake news confident that the Fox News audience strays no further. There is little risk they’ll encounter what’s actually being said elsewhere in the media. A great swath of the American public is told alternate truth. Rather like North Korea.